Beyond Minimum: Why Accommodation Is a Measure of Leadership
We often hear the phrase "reasonable accommodation."
Too often, the conversation begins and ends with what the law requires.
I believe that's asking the wrong question.
The better question is this:
What kind of leader do you want to be?
There is an important distinction between Occupational Health and Safety, human rights legislation, and return-to-work practices.
They overlap, but they are not interchangeable.
A workplace may meet every minimum safety requirement and still have a duty to consider accommodation.
Accommodation is not about lowering standards.
It is not about creating unfair advantages.
It is not about removing accountability.
At its heart, accommodation is about removing barriers that prevent capable people from contributing to the best of their abilities.
That is leadership.
Communication Is an Accommodation
As an autistic person, I have often found that the greatest barrier is not my autism.
It is communication.
Many autistic people appreciate direct communication because it removes ambiguity. It reduces unnecessary anxiety and allows us to focus on solving problems rather than interpreting hidden meanings.
But the more I think about it, the more I wonder if this is really an autism issue at all.
Who benefits from vague expectations?
Who benefits from delayed communication?
Who benefits from guessing what someone actually means?
Clear, respectful and timely communication benefits everyone.
Perhaps autistic people simply remind us what good communication should have been all along.
We Are More Than One Identity
I am autistic.
I am also the child of a residential school survivor.
I am getting older.
I have experienced workplace injury.
I work in community leadership and recovery advocacy.
None of these identities cancel each other out.
They intersect.
Our workplaces often struggle with intersectionality because they prefer simple categories.
People are rarely simple.
A worker may be experienced, aging, disabled, Indigenous, highly educated in their field, and recovering from an injury at the same time.
Leadership requires seeing the whole person instead of reducing them to one characteristic.
Age Is Not Incompetence
There is another assumption I have encountered throughout my life.
As people age, questions sometimes shift from "How can we help you succeed?" to "Can you still do this?"
Sometimes those are legitimate questions.
Sometimes they are assumptions disguised as concern.
Experience has value.
Wisdom has value.
Adaptation has value.
Growing older should not automatically place someone under suspicion.
The goal should never be to decide whether someone still belongs.
The goal should be to determine what supports allow capable people to continue contributing safely and successfully.
Leadership Beyond Compliance
The organizations that inspire me most are not those that merely satisfy legal requirements.
They ask better questions.
How do we retain good people?
How do we remove unnecessary barriers?
How do we create psychologically safe workplaces?
How do we communicate with clarity and respect?
How do we support someone after life inevitably happens?
Because life always happens.
People become injured.
People develop disabilities.
People experience trauma.
People age.
None of those realities diminish human worth.
Leadership begins where minimum compliance ends.
That is the kind of leadership I believe our workplaces, governments, and communities deserve.
"Accommodation is not about lowering standards. It is about removing unnecessary barriers so people can continue to contribute with dignity."
Comments
Post a Comment