When Policy Pretends to Be Law: Provinces, Indigenous Rights, and Canada’s Constitutional Contradiction

-
Canada presents itself as a human-rights-respecting nation grounded in constitutional law, reconciliation, and the rule of law.
But beneath that narrative is a contradiction so normalized that most institutions no longer see it.

Provincial governments and the organizations they authorize operate on Indigenous territories every day.
They regulate work, health, housing, labour, compensation, and justice.
They exercise delegated Crown authority.

Yet many of these same institutions:

Have no binding UNDRIP policy

Have no structural implementation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action

Treat Indigenous rights as symbolic, advisory, or aspirational

Govern as though internal policy outranks constitutional law


This is not a minor administrative gap.
It is a structural contradiction at the heart of Canadian governance.

Indigenous Rights Are Not Granted by Provinces

Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms existing Aboriginal and Treaty rights.
These rights are inherent.
They pre-exist Canada.
They pre-exist provinces.
They are not delegated by policy.
They are not optional.

Provinces do not “give” Indigenous peoples rights.
They are constitutionally bound to respect them.

The same principle applies to human rights in Canada more broadly.
Human rights are not permissions issued by administrators.
They are inherent and fundamental.

And yet, in practice, provincial institutions routinely act as though rights only exist when policy says they do.

How Policy Becomes a Weapon

This is where the contradiction sharpens.

When institutions claim they “respect” Indigenous rights but refuse to implement UNDRIP or TRC commitments in binding ways, respect becomes performative.

When policy is used to delay, narrow, or deflect constitutional obligations, policy becomes a weapon.

When Indigenous rights are acknowledged in principle but denied in process, reconciliation becomes branding rather than governance.

This creates a quiet inversion of legal hierarchy:

Constitutional law becomes symbolic

International human rights norms become optional

Internal policy becomes enforceable


The result is a system that appears lawful while structurally avoiding accountability.

Provinces, the Crown, and Treaty Relationships

Provinces often speak as though Crown obligations belong elsewhere; 
federally, abstractly, historically.

But provinces exercise Crown authority every day.

They regulate lands covered by Treaties.
They manage natural resources on Indigenous territories.
They administer systems that profoundly affect Indigenous lives.

To claim authority without responsibility is to hollow out the Treaty relationship itself.

If provinces assert jurisdiction while distancing themselves from Crown obligations, then Treaties are reduced to ceremony rather than living agreements.

This Is Not Legal Confusion. It Is Governance Failure.

None of this is unclear in law.

Canadian courts have repeatedly affirmed that infringements on Indigenous rights require strict justification, meaningful consultation, and adherence to the honour of the Crown.

The problem is not absence of law. The problem is how systems behave when policy is allowed to override principle.

This is what Canada’s systems teach in practice:

Law is symbolic.
Policy is enforceable.
Rights are acknowledged, then managed away.

This is the real pedagogy of Canadian institutions.

What Leadership Requires Now

Leadership today cannot rely on reconciliation language alone.

It requires:

Structural implementation, not aspirational statements

Alignment of policy with constitutional and inherent rights

Willingness to confront how institutions actually operate, not how they brand themselves


Until policy stops pretending to be law, and institutions stop treating Indigenous rights as negotiable, Canada’s reconciliation project will remain unfinished.

Not because the principles are unclear,
but because the systems refuse to obey them.

  Shawn Raven
Author, Pedagogy of Canada’s Systems: Fire, Law, and the Method of Refusal

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Applied Pedagogy: How the AHRC Directive Revealed Systemic Refusal

-
A living case study by Shawn Raven This is the first public analysis applying my book’s framework to a real conflict with a Canadian institution. What I teach is not theory. It is lived law. It is applied pedagogy. It is survival turned into methodology. This is what it looks like in practice. --- The Context I submitted a human rights complaint. I cited my rights under the Charter, UNDRIP, TRC, and multiple sections of human rights legislation. I identified disability barriers, Indigenous rights, and systemic discrimination. Their response: A directive accusing my communication of being “rude,” “aggressive,” or “inappropriate.” The usual coded language used against autistic, Indigenous, trauma-surviving people who assert their rights clearly and without apology. This is what systems do when you step outside their preferred communication frame. They do not rebut the law. They attack tone. They pivot from substance to discipline. It is refusal disguised as “procedure.” This is the exact...
Read more

About Shawn Raven

-
Image
I am Shawn Raven,   I am a writer, storyteller, and fire-carrier. My work is rooted in truth, healing, and the remembering of what it means to be fully human. I write about the world we have inherited. I write about the world we have forgotten. And I write about the world we are becoming. My voice comes from lived experience;  trauma, survival, identity, leadership, and the long path home to myself. My writing blends Indigenous worldview, philosophy, and fire: the kind that burns away illusion and awakens something real in the reader. This space, I AM THE FIRE, is where I share reflections, teachings, and pieces of my journey. It is where I speak on humanity, decolonization, culture, spirit, and the sacred connection to the Earth that modern society has tried to erase. If my words reach you, I hope they remind you of something older than fear. Something deeper than shame. Something true. We are already enough. We already belong. And it is time for all of us t...
Read more

My New Ebook Drops in 72 Hours

-
Image
My New Ebook Drops in 72 Hours I’m excited to announce that my new ebook, Pedagogy of Canada’s Systems: Fire, Law, and the Method of Refusal, will be available on Kindle in just 72 hours. This project grew out of lived experience,  not theory. I wrote this book because of the systemic rot that runs through institutions and organizations across Canada. These are systems that claim to uphold the Charter, the TRC Calls to Action, UNDRIP, and human rights… yet too often hide behind internal policy instead of standing on law, truth, and responsibility. That contradiction is not abstract. It affects real people every day. This book is my refusal to accept that gap as “normal.” It is a challenge to the narratives that protect institutions instead of the individuals they claim to serve. Why This Book Matters Because rights without enforcement are meaningless. Because systems cannot heal themselves without pressure, truth, and fire. Because lived experience is evidence and often the only ki...
Read more