“People Don’t Want the Truth, They Want Confirmation”

-
There’s something I’ve been noticing more and more when I read online.

It’s not just disagreement.
It’s not just different perspectives.

It’s something deeper.

Most people aren’t actually looking for the truth.

They’re looking for something that feels right to them.

Something that confirms what they already believe.
Something that protects their identity.
Something that doesn’t force them to question themselves.

And the internet makes that easy.

You can scroll for five minutes and find:

an article that agrees with you

a video that validates your position

a comment section that reinforces your worldview


No friction. No challenge. No discomfort.

But here’s the problem.

Truth doesn’t work like that.

Truth is often inconvenient.
It challenges us.
It forces us to sit in discomfort.
It asks us to admit we might be wrong.

And most people, myself included sometimes, don’t like that.


THE ILLUSION OF “DOING RESEARCH "

We like to think we’re informed.

We say: "I’ve done my research."

But what does that really mean?

Does it mean we actively searched for opposing views?

Or does it mean we gathered sources that supported what we already believed?

There’s a difference.

Real inquiry asks:

"What if I’m wrong?"

"What would disprove my position?"

"Am I willing to change my mind?"


That’s uncomfortable work.

And most people don’t do it.




Why This Matters

This isn’t just about being right or wrong online.

It’s about how we live together.

When people only consume what confirms them:

division grows

empathy shrinks

conversations turn into battles


And nobody actually listens.

We stop trying to understand.
We start trying to win.




A Hard Truth

Here’s the part that’s uncomfortable.

This isn’t just "other people."

This is all of us.

Every one of us has:

biases

blind spots

beliefs we protect


The difference is whether we’re willing to see that.




A Different Approach

What if we approached information differently?

Not as something to defend ourselves with…
…but as something to challenge ourselves with.

What if we asked:

"What am I missing?"

"Why does this bother me?"

"What would it take for me to change my mind?"


That’s where growth happens.

Not in certainty.
In questioning.




Final Thought

People don’t just want truth.

They want comfort, identity, and certainty.

Truth often takes all three away.

So the real question isn’t: “Why don’t people want the truth?”

It’s:

Are we willing to face it when it challenges us?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Applied Pedagogy: How the AHRC Directive Revealed Systemic Refusal

-
A living case study by Shawn Raven This is the first public analysis applying my book’s framework to a real conflict with a Canadian institution. What I teach is not theory. It is lived law. It is applied pedagogy. It is survival turned into methodology. This is what it looks like in practice. --- The Context I submitted a human rights complaint. I cited my rights under the Charter, UNDRIP, TRC, and multiple sections of human rights legislation. I identified disability barriers, Indigenous rights, and systemic discrimination. Their response: A directive accusing my communication of being “rude,” “aggressive,” or “inappropriate.” The usual coded language used against autistic, Indigenous, trauma-surviving people who assert their rights clearly and without apology. This is what systems do when you step outside their preferred communication frame. They do not rebut the law. They attack tone. They pivot from substance to discipline. It is refusal disguised as “procedure.” This is the exact...
Read more

When Policy Pretends to Be Law: Provinces, Indigenous Rights, and Canada’s Constitutional Contradiction

-
Image
Canada presents itself as a human-rights-respecting nation grounded in constitutional law, reconciliation, and the rule of law. But beneath that narrative is a contradiction so normalized that most institutions no longer see it. Provincial governments and the organizations they authorize operate on Indigenous territories every day. They regulate work, health, housing, labour, compensation, and justice. They exercise delegated Crown authority. Yet many of these same institutions: Have no binding UNDRIP policy Have no structural implementation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action Treat Indigenous rights as symbolic, advisory, or aspirational Govern as though internal policy outranks constitutional law This is not a minor administrative gap. It is a structural contradiction at the heart of Canadian governance. Indigenous Rights Are Not Granted by Provinces Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms existing Aboriginal and Treaty rights. These r...
Read more

About Shawn Raven

-
Image
I am Shawn Raven,   I am a writer, storyteller, and fire-carrier. My work is rooted in truth, healing, and the remembering of what it means to be fully human. I write about the world we have inherited. I write about the world we have forgotten. And I write about the world we are becoming. My voice comes from lived experience;  trauma, survival, identity, leadership, and the long path home to myself. My writing blends Indigenous worldview, philosophy, and fire: the kind that burns away illusion and awakens something real in the reader. This space, I AM THE FIRE, is where I share reflections, teachings, and pieces of my journey. It is where I speak on humanity, decolonization, culture, spirit, and the sacred connection to the Earth that modern society has tried to erase. If my words reach you, I hope they remind you of something older than fear. Something deeper than shame. Something true. We are already enough. We already belong. And it is time for all of us t...
Read more